Cases 51 - 60 of 61,900
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Shawn Myron Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tillman et al v. Edwards et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Tillman, Cardarrin Tillman and Joelindiya Collins
Defendant:
Daniel H Edwards, Jerry D Martin, Joe Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Mary Kemp
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murdock v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Sasshae Alicia Murdock
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hogue v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hogue
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEAL v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
YVONNE LEAL
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nancy L.C. v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv05142
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. C.
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Christoffers
as 8:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Brenna J. Christoffers
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ducommun v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05119
Plaintiff:
Michelle Renee Ducommun
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
