Cases 51 - 60 of 729
MCNEILL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00438
Petitioner:
NORMAN JAMES MCNEILL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McNeill v. USA
as 5:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Demetrios Donell McNeill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WASHINGTON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
DEREK MCNEILL WASHINGTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James McNeill v. Joseph Lightsey
as 23-6498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, JOHNNY HAWKINS, BILLY O. COOPER and others
Demetrios McNeill v. Warden R. Ramos
as 23-6488
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. RAMOS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reaves v. Schwedo et al
as 4:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Kevin Schwedo, Thomas Scott Wilkerson, Robert "Rob" Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Toby McDuffie, Jr. v. Wade
as 23-6411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY M. MCDUFFIE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. WADE, CHENEQUA MCNEILL and CAPTAIN THOMPSON
McNeill v. WST JMW LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
DENICE MCNEILL
Defendant:
WST JMW LLC and MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McNeill v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20204
Plaintiff:
Timothy McNeill
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bradford et al
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Defendant:
Zachary K. Bradford, Lori L. Love, Matthew S. Schultz and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cleanspark,Inc
Interested Party:
Andrea Ciceri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
