Cases 51 - 60 of 595
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pickens v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Pickens
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail and Mobile County D.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Ruffin v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
Darrell Ruffin
Respondent:
Mobile County Metro Jail and Mobile County Court House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Latawerence W. White
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department, Mobile Police Department, Mawss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pickens v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Pickens
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail and Mobile County D.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mobile Metro Jail
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Kameron Lee Williams
Defendant:
Mobile Metro Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mobile County Circuit Court
as 1:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kameron Lee Williams
Defendant:
Mobile County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Mobile County District Court
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Kameron Lee Williams
Defendant:
Mobile County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.