Cases 51 - 60 of 746
Moore v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Carl Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
ANDREWS v. LOWER, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
CRISPIN-KERBY: ANDREWS
Defendant:
LOWER, LLC, MOORE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, UNITED STATES BANKRUPCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. MANSBERRY et al
as 1:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
CAROL D. MOORE
Defendant:
STEVE MANSBERRY, ALICE C. STUBBS and THARRINGTON SMITH, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Cassidy
as 3:2023cv00665
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Moore
Respondent:
David Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Moore v. Hardy
as 5:2023hc02166
Petitioner:
Quartez Travon Moore
Respondent:
Wendy Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MORENO et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
ALMA MORENO, AMINAH HAWLEY, ANNETTE KRAVITZ and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
