Cases 51 - 60 of 2,476
Malachowski v. Rivers
as 23-10614
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcel Malachowski
Respondent / Appellee:
NFN Rivers, Warden
Jones v. Thompson et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Cole Thompson, NFN Garcia and NFN Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. Mayor of the City of Miami
as 23-1982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, CITY OF MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, JORGE LOO and others
King v. Delapp
as 23-10540
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brandon Clyde King
Respondent / Appellee:
NFN Delapp, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and NFN Delapp, Warden
Recio v. Sphere et al
as 2:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vallejo Recio
Defendant:
Sphere, NFN Semour, NFN Deleon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Mackey et al
as 3:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Scottie H Gibson
Defendant:
NFN Mackey, NFN Ridlinger and Sydney Hewlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pimpton v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Frederick Devell Pimpton
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, NFN Gonzales, T Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lekram v. Everlast Worldwide Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03911
Plaintiff:
NFN (Frank) Lekram
Defendant:
Everlast Worldwide Inc. and Mark Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ashton v. AllianceRX Walgreens Pharmacy et al
as 3:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ashton
Defendant:
AllianceRX Walgreens Pharmacy and NLN NFN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McGee v. Hayden et al
as 6:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Karl Lynn McGee
Defendant:
NFN Hayden and Tyler Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
