Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Nolan v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Steven Nolan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coakley v. Fort Wayne City of The et al
as 1:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Coakley, Jr
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of The , James Arnold , Christopher Felton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLEMAN v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00413
Respondent:
K. BUTTS
Petitioner:
NOLAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2011cv00148
Petitioner:
Clayton Brown
Respondent:
Superintendent, Bessie Leonard and Stacy Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norington v. Daniels et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Norington
Defendant:
Mitchell E Daniels, Jr, Edwin G Buss, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowsby v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ian Rowsby
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank and Does 1-20
Cross Defendant:
Nolan's RV Center, Inc. and Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Wells Fargo Bank
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Nolan's RV Center Inc and Nolan's RV Center Inc
ThirdParty Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach Inc and Nolan's RV Center Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medical Assurance Company Inc The v. Miller et al
as 4:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Medical Assurance Company Inc The, Medical Assurance Company Inc The and Medical Assurance Company Inc The
Defendant:
Alexander C Miller, Mary Knight, Mary Knight and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUST v. CLOUSER et al
as 1:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE RUST
Defendant:
LAURA M. CLOUSER and NOLAN D. PYKE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
