Cases 51 - 60 of 233
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HUGH LUCAS
Defendant:
NURSE HALL, NURSE PRACTIONER LINDSEY, GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
as 4:2020cv00004
Defendant:
RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Plaintiff:
JETTA NICHOLE MOSS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, Sergeant Wilcox, DOCTOR WANTS and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Junior Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. DL Investment Holdings, LLC
as 1:2019cv04291
Defendant:
DL Investment Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Betty Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eubanks v. Boggs et al
as 1:2019cv02944
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Eubanks
Defendant:
Officer Keith Nichols, Officer Robert Howell, Officer Adam Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv02773
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Carla D. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKeehan et al v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Alex Dwyane Patten, Jacob Ray Vincent Nicholson, Marvin Antonio Hinds and others
Defendant:
Shane Presgraves and Chad Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNN v. WARD et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
LYNN BILL, DR MACK STEVENS, LAURA FIVEASH and others
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND DUNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019mi00089
Plaintiff:
Nichole Fleming
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Health
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
