Cases 51 - 60 of 25,215
Silvas v. Ltx. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas
Defendant:
Ltx. Brown, Sgt. Perez, Corporal Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3437
Petitioner:
IVONNE GONZALEZ PEREZ, JEFFREY SERRANO GONZALEZ, JOSEF SERRANO GONZALEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez Gomez v. Perez Rendiles et al
as 1:2024cv22083
Plaintiff:
Augusto Perez Gomez
Defendant:
Francisco Perez Rendiles and Francisco Perez Landaeta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Perez
as 24-1484
Defendant:
JEREMIAH PEREZ and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hopkins v. Cruz et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Joe R. Hopkins
Defendant:
Felix Cruz, Secretary Of The Deparment Of Corrections, Elliott Ernesto Perez Lugo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABRERA PEREZ v. WAL-MART INC ET AL.
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
NANCY CABRERA PEREZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reyes v. Sindicado de Aseguradoras para la Suscripcion Conjunta de Seguros de Responsabilidad Profesional Medico Hospitalaria et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Aracelis Reyes
Defendant:
Sindicado de Aseguradoras para la Suscripcion Conjunta de Seguros de Responsabilidad Profesional Medico Hospitalaria, Dr. Francisco Perez-Gil, Hospital Episcopal San Lucas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Trujillo-Perez v. Garland
as 24-60262
Petitioner:
Luis Angel Trujillo-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
