Cases 51 - 60 of 299
Frederick et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2020cv01508
Plaintiff:
Bill Hoover, Richard Sivley, Pernecia Hull and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sally v. Panera Bread Company et al
as 4:2020cv01068
Defendant:
Panera Bread Company, St. Louis Bread Co. and Panera, LLC
Plaintiff:
Randall Sally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mowen v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2020cv00838
Plaintiff:
Randall Mowen
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons v. Myers et al
as 6:2020cv03175
Defendant:
Cheyenne Randall, Mason Dishman, Jacob Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kylie Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Farley et al
as 4:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Susan McCarthy-Elliott, Debbie Farley, Randall J. Schlegel and others
Plaintiff:
Lester B. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Integrity Life Insurance Company v. HOUSE et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Defendant:
David Bickmeyer, ALVIN BICKMEYER, Kenneth Enloe and others
Plaintiff:
Integrity Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Finch et al
as 1:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Unknown Prest, United States Marshals, Jason Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Finch et al
as 1:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Unknown Prest, United States Marshals, Jason Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rankin, Frederick Hackney, Donald Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nottingham v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
Nottingham, Randal A Nottingham and Randal A. Nottingham
Defendant:
Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Davis Bey v. Heggie et al
as 4:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Joan M. Gilmer, Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, Circuit Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Jada Davis Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
