Cases 51 - 60 of 684
Hundley v. White et al
as 5:2022ct03388
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ray Hundley
Defendant:
Keno White, Gavin Lowry and Sgt. Steven Tubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Beaufort County District Court
as 5:2022hc02178
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Williams
Respondent:
Beaufort County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Asby et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray Asby and Caroline Asby
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic Logistics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ray v. Russell et al
as 5:2022ct03362
Plaintiff:
Darin Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Sgt. Russell and Asst. Unit Manager Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
James Shelton Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mr. Joshua Stein, Town of Cary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ray v. Russell et al
as 3:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Darin Anthony Ray
Defendant:
FNU Russell and FNU Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunting v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2022ct03331
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Bunting
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00650
Petitioner:
GORDON RAY JONES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
