Cases 51 - 60 of 16,963
GRANT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00338
Defendant:
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT RILEY, WENDY PAYNE, ASHLEY CHIOCCO and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE L. GRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RILEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05991
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RILEY
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
CALLAHAN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00305
Defendant:
MORGAN OLIVER, JANE DOE, MICHAEL RILEY and others
Plaintiff:
VARIAN C. CALLAHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MARTINCIC et al v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv00958
Defendant:
YUBA HEAT TRANSFER LLC, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, MW CUSTOM PAPERS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MERL WILLIAMS and DAVID MARTINCIC
Cross Defendant:
I.U. NORTH AMERICAN, INC., ALCOA, INC, TRECO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Riley v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv01100
Defendant:
Mahanoy Prison, Practioner Gusitutt, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Warren J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2020cv02048
Respondent:
MELINDA ADAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
CHARLES RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Chris Haines, Greg Mendenhall, UPMC Pinnacle and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Riley and Thomas Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. WAL-MART, INC.
as 3:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
STEVEN THOMAS RILEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELANSARI v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2019cv06198
Defendant:
SHAY O. RAMIREZ, PAYPAL INC., LT CARROL and others
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
