Cases 51 - 60 of 268
RAMIREZ v. GONZALEZ
as 5:2019cv05519
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
LILLIE GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEJIA et al v. KVK-TECH, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04841
Defendant:
KVK-TECH, INC., 110 TERRY DR.LP, MURTY VEPURI and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ and OSCAR MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GALVIS et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03915
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., HOME DEPOT and JANE AND JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO GALVIS and DORA RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00960
Defendant:
DR. RAMIREZ, ROBERT GILMORE, BRITTNY CHIAVETTI and others
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Lopez et al
as 1:2019cv00801
Defendant:
Two Brothers Pizzeria Italian Market, Leonardo Lopez, Giuro, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coutinho-Silva v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00783
Plaintiff:
Anderson Coutinho-Silva
Defendant:
Ramirez, Food Service Staff, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. GILLMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00397
Defendant:
AUSTIN, JOHNSON, CARO and others
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Candido v. Ashli
as 3:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Ashli, David J Ebbert and P. Ramirez
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Serrano Candido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
