Cases 51 - 60 of 1,684
Rogers v. USA
as 9:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Terrell Justin Rogers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
North v. Bank et al
as 4:2023cv03313
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Discover Bank and Roger Hochschild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Utz v. Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP
as 4:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Roger Utz
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. State Farm
as 6:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Shirley E Rogers
Defendant:
State Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Blackburn v. Lubbock FBI et al
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Amy Louise Blackburn
Defendant:
Lubbock FBI, John Waters, Sr., John Waters, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rogers v. City of Santa Fe et al
as 4:2023cv02757
Plaintiff:
Taylor Rose Rogers
Defendant:
City of Santa Fe, Ruben Espinoza and Christian Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Abbott et al
as 1:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
United States of America.
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and The State of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey Arrington, Dr. Brian Babin, Cong. Andy Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 403 Obstruction of Navigable Waters
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieves v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Jorge H. Nieves
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Roger Clifford, Brittany S Clifford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
