Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at00954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hazelton v. Duncan et al
as 1:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
Wallace F. Hazelton, Jr.
Defendant:
Van Duncan, Ronald L. Moore, Thomas Amburgey and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moore v. Steward
as 2:2009cv02698
Petitioner:
Ronald Donnell Moore
Respondent:
Henry Steward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Johnny Quik #163 et al
as 1:2009cv01525
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dean Moore
Defendant:
Johnny Quik #163 and Brar and Chahal Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Moore v. Johnny Quik #163 et al
as 1:2009at00697
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dean Moore
Defendant:
Johnny Quik #163 and Brar and Chahal Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Moore v. Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., et al.
as 1:2009cv01423
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dean Moore
Defendant:
Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., Carrows California Family Restaurants, Inc. and Carrows Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
