Cases 51 - 60 of 336
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LaBreche v. Chambers et al
as 1:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Andrew LaBreche
Defendant:
David Chambers, Tommy Davis, Robert Martelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lusa et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Yananta Isi Chito Lusa, Wild Fire, Hakeem Shabazz-El and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Donna Scott Davenport and Lynn Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accord v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Polk County, Tennessee, Hamilton County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Accord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Johnson v. Charles Rettig, et al
as 21-5648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service, TERRY HARGETT, Tennessee Secretary of State, JANET YELLEN, Treasury Secretary of the United States and others
Ross v. Rudd Medical Care et al
as 3:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Rudd Medical Care
Plaintiff:
Brent Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Parsons et al
as 3:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Deputy f/n/u Parsons
Plaintiff:
Charles Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammell v. Rudd et al
as 3:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Chief (f/n/u) Fly and Dr. (f/n/u) Rudd
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. City of Murfreesboro, et al.
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Bill Doe, Chief Michael Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
