Cases 51 - 60 of 88
HEARD v. Fields et al
as 7:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
Shenondah Fields, BRIAN OWENS, SAM OLENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARD v. Fields et al
as 7:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
Shenondah Fields, BRIAN OWENS, MARTY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. State of Georgia, et al.
as 1:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Willie Bernard Butler
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Sam Olens, Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2013cv00030
Petitioner:
WILLIE BERNARD BUTLER
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA, SAM OLENS, BRIAN OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heard v. Owens
as 1:2012cv04318
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Sam Olens, Nathan Deal and others
Richardson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2012cv03342
Plaintiff:
Curtis Richardson
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, State of Georgia, Sam Olens and others
Walker v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv03299
Petitioner:
Lewis Parker Walker
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Sam Olens and Marty Allen
Little et al v. Olens et al
as 1:2012cv03285
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Little and Lolita M. Welch
Defendant:
Sam Olens , Macon Judicial Circuit Court , Sharell Lewis and others
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dabney
as 1:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Gregory D. Dabney, II
Thirdparty_defendant:
Nathan Deal and Sam Olens
Counter_claimant:
Gregory D. Dabney, II
Counter_defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA , Nathan Deal and Sam Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Sampson-El v. Georgia Lottery Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Khufu-Ranub Sampson-El
Defendant:
Georgia Lottery Corporation , Margaret R DeFrancisco , Teri J Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
