Cases 51 - 60 of 19,844
Robert Sanchez v. Auto Emporium et al
as 8:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SANCHEZ
Defendant:
AUTO EMPORIUM, a business entity, JOE LEZMA and MF REAL ESTATE LLC, a California limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rodriguez v. Joe Corley Detention Facility
as 4:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
Saul Sanchez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joe Corley Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D. Diaz v. Paul Camacho et al
as 2:2024cv03737
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
PAUL CAMACHO, N. CALVILLO, G. PRECIADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanchez-Leyva v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 6:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
Gerardo Antonio Sanchez-Leyva
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03633
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blanchard v. Warden for MCTC et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Warden for MCTC and Correctional Officer Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Mac R. Behnke Rentals, Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv03621
Plaintiff:
Myria Griffin
Defendant:
Mac R. Behnke Rentals, Ltd. and Felipe Sanchez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
