Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gerard Atchison, Sr. v. Sears, et al
as 09-4241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARD W. ATCHISON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS, SEARS HOLDING CORP, SEARS HOLDINGS and others
Lindsey v. Capital Cleaning Contractors et al
as 1:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
Barry Daniel Lindsey
Defendant:
Capital Cleaning Contractors and Sears Holding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERMAN v. B.F. GOODRICH et al
as 2:2009cv03678
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE E. HERMAN and Maureen Herman
Defendant:
B.F. GOODRICH, BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC., BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Donia v. Sears Holdings Corp.
as 1:2008cv03764
Plaintiff:
Giuseppina P. Donia and Giuseppina P. Donia
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corp., Sears Holdings Corp. and Sears Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
