Cases 51 - 60 of 207
SELDON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Defendant:
DR. SUTHERLAND, JOHN DOE LEE, ROBERT MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WALLACE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00257
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FROSTER, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CARZELL WALLACE, JR. and CARZELL WALLACE JUNIOR,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20174
Plaintiff:
Kathy Silva
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARPE & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Silva et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2018cv02135
Plaintiff:
Kaley Diann Silva and Lindsey Avenetti
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01476
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00355
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
