Cases 51 - 60 of 456
Olmos Solorzano v. Garland
as 23-277
Petitioner:
OMAR ALEJANDRO OLMOS SOLORZANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Solorzano et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
David Solorzano and Myriam Solorzano
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hilton v. Centurion Health Services of Florida et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Antonio Michael Hilton
Defendant:
Centurion Health Services of Florida and R. Solorzano-Pallais
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maha Elregragui Moqaddem v. Upinder S Kalra et al
as 5:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Maha El Regragui Moqaddem and Maha Elregragui Moqaddem
Defendant:
Upinder S Kalra, Lauren Weis Birnstein, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linares Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-119
Petitioner:
IRIS LINARES RAMOS and ROSSELYN SOLORZANO LINARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. Kalra et al
as 5:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
Upinder S Kalra, Judge Lauren Weis Birnstein, JUDGE MARK E WINDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cowen Construction, Inc. v. Solorzano & Sons Construction, LLC
as 4:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Cowen Construction, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Solorzano & Sons Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Solorzano v. Lovett
as 5:2022cv00303
Petitioner:
Julio Solorzano
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
