Cases 51 - 60 of 2,217
Brown El v. T G Towing LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
J M Brown El
Defendant:
T G Towing LLC and Tony R Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Robinson v. Clerk at T&U Gas Station et al
as 2:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Robinson
Defendant:
Clerk at T&U Gas Station, Officer W Hunt and Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schumann v. Arthur et al
as 2:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Keith Schumann
Defendant:
Hugh P Arthur, E T Smith and CTC, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Childs v. Lamar et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Yancey A. Childs
Defendant:
David Lamar and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West Alabama Women's Center et al v. Marshall (MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
West Alabama Women's Center, Yashica Robinson and Alabama Women's Center
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R. Adair, T. Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chatman v. Matthew et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Stanley Brent Chatman
Defendant:
T Matthew, R Brewter and R Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Deontae L. Hudson
Defendant:
Kilby, T. Rudolph, L. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lamar et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Dexter Jackson
Defendant:
David Lamar and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
