Cases 51 - 60 of 2,655
Wilburn v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrell Wilburn and Anthony T Wilburn
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IRVING v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
DEJON IRVING
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
S & S Homes, LLC et al v. City of Peru, Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
S & S Homes, LLC, Zachary See and Michael Selleck
Defendant:
City of Peru, Indiana, City of Peru Building Department, Ronald Dausch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
CLARK v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
IZIAH CLARK
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CARR v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY CARR
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CROSS v. RULES
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
ANTON CROSS
Respondent:
T. RULES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KNOX v. CHEATAM et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
KEVERY KRISTOPHER KNOX
Defendant:
CHEATAM, T. BARNHART and J. SAJNAJ SAJNAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SWADER v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00585
Petitioner:
SWADER and KHALIL ANTONIO SWADER
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PRESLEY v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00578
Petitioner:
TEVAUGHN PRESLEY
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
