Cases 51 - 60 of 63
McKenzie v. Stevens et al
as 3:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
Darryll Joel McKenzie
Defendant:
Jason Stevens, Kevin Roundtree, J. D. Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Darryll Joel McKenzie
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, Jason Stevens, Kevin Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKenzie v. Stevens et al
as 3:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Darryll Joel McKenzie
Defendant:
Jason Stevens, Kevin Roundtree, T. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKenzie v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
Darryll Joel McKenzie
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Steven Singer, T. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ford v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Ford
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ford v. Astrue. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 09-4. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2009mc00004
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Ford
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-8228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Defendant - None:
AMERICAN AMENITIES INCORPORATED, Distributor of toothpaste and deoderant
LUCKY MCGEE HARRIS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY et al
as 1:2008cv04264
Plaintiff:
LUCKY MCGEE HARRIS
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
