Cases 51 - 60 of 124
Cannon v. Newton Correctional Facility
as 4:2020cv00116
Respondent:
Newton Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Cannon
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cannon v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv02025
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Cannon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TATUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34199
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW TATUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johns v. Burns M Brady Center et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Johns
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Burns M Brady Center and Heather Swinnie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johns v. Burns M Brady Center et al
as 3:2020cv00110
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Johns
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Burns M Brady Center, Heather Swinnie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Hayes, Jr. v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2019cv03276
Respondent:
State Of Maryland
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Hayes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Ononye
as 1:2019cv03321
Defendant:
Chuma Ononye
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Andrews, Jr. et al v. International Longshoremen's Association Local 1475 Clerks and Checkers Union, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Zach Hopkinson, Michael Hogan, Joshua Sharpe and others
Defendant:
Georgia Stevedore Association, Inc., Ceres Marine Terminals Inc., International Longshoremen's Association Local 1475 Clerks and Checkers Union, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hussey v. Kaizen Media Group LLC et al
as 1:2018cv11714
Defendant:
Belal Ayoub, Michael Rosenfeld, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hussey and Thomas Andrew Hussey
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
