Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Dang et al
as 5:2014cv01789
Defendant:
Cuong Cao Dang, Tri Cao Dang, Vu Van Le and others
Claimant:
Thu Hanh "Sophie" Nguyen
Plaintiff:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Nguyen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31263
Plaintiff:
Thuy Nguyen and Phu Tan Nguyen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thuy Nguyen v. Carolyn Colvin
as 13-36097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THUY NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Nguyen v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-04335
Plaintiff:
Thu Thuy Nguyen
Defendant:
Nong Shim Company, Ltd , Nongshim America, Inc. , Ottogi Company, Ltd. and others
Nguyen v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al
as 3:2013cv04335
Plaintiff:
Thu Thuy Nguyen
Defendant:
Nong Shim Company, Ltd, Nongshim America, Inc. , Ottogi Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Nguyen
as 3:2013cv04329
Plaintiff:
Thu Thuy Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. et al v. Wagner World, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02827
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. , Ciena Capital Funding LLC , HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and others
Defendant:
Wagner World, LLC, Wolfman, Inc., Aberta Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Nguyen v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02847
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Thuy Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
NGUYEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00479
Petitioner:
THUY NGUYEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Nguyen v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01025
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Thuy Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
