Cases 51 - 60 of 305
MCKAY v. GIBBONS et al
as 2:2018cv02112
Plaintiff:
MARK MCKAY
Defendant:
TED KRIMMEL, BRIAN HESSENTHALER, CHRISTOPHER GRAYO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT R-9 OWNER GP, LLC v. TMG MID-ATLANTIC, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01674
Plaintiff:
WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT R-9 OWNER GP, LLC
Defendant:
TMG MID-ATLANTIC, LLC and TED'S MONTANA GRILL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Price v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00583
Plaintiff:
Donnell Price
Defendant:
W. Ted Williams, Hans Reisinger, Ficks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FETTERMAN v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS DAVID FETTERMAN
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BRUCE R. ERB, TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oke v. Garman et al
as 3:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
Ayodele Oke
Defendant:
Mark Garman, McMahon, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
MARY BUSH
Defendant:
EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, JAMES RENEGAR and TED LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddowes v. Director of State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Shane Eddowes
Defendant:
Director of State Department of Corrections, Mark Gorman , Morris Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARR v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. BARR, JR.
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , BRUCE R. ERB , TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICKS v. ROBLYER
as 5:2017cv05550
Plaintiff:
KYMNYQUE RICKS
Defendant:
TED ROBLYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARR v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv05368
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. BARR, JR.
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BRUCE R. ERB, TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
