Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Timothy Lee v. Gaines County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 17-10851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PATRICK LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
GAINES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SOUTH PLAINS TASK FORCE and ARTHUR AGUILAR, JR.
DUNIGAN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY PATRICK DUNIGAN, IV
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Gaines County Sheriff
as 5:2017cv00179
Petitioner:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Respondent:
Gaines County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Bermear
as 5:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Mike Bermear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Roberson et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Patricia Ann Roberson and Richard Wiebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. 106th Judicial District of Texas
as 5:2017cv00133
Petitioner:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Respondent:
106th Judicial District of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STACK v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00365
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PATRICK STACK
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-11834
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Coffey Nursery Landscape Inc. et al v. Soave et al
as 2:2017cv01436
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Coffey and Timothy Coffey Nursery Landscape Inc.
Defendant:
Ben Soave, Dominic Soave, Taina Communications, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lee v. Seminole Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Defendant:
Seminole Police Department, Corey Furlow and Victor Montes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
