Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Wilks v. Priest et al
as 2:2013cv00553
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilks
Defendant:
William W. Priest, Enrique R. Arzac, Jeffrey L. Berenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
George et al v. TD Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv01695
Plaintiff:
Nneka George and Brian Conzelman
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A. , TD Auto Finance LLC , TD Bank US Holding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant:
THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Singh et al
as 1:2011cv01376
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lal Singh
Garnishee:
Toronto Dominion Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
United States of America v. $67,065 United States Currency
as 1:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$67,065 United States Currency
Claimant:
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Stephens v. Toronto Dominion Bank
as 11-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John K. Stephens
Defendant - Appellee:
Toronto Dominion Bank, AKA Le Groupe Financier Banque TD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated-Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter-Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
