Cases 51 - 60 of 325
Vassios v. Van Buren, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jason Vassios
Defendant:
County of Van Buren, Anthony Turner and Van Buren, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHEATOMS JR. v. City of Detroit et al
as 4:2022cv10410
Plaintiff:
EVANS CHEATOMS JR.
Defendant:
City of Detroit, City of Detroit Police Department, Alfredo Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Nash #406338 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Brent James Nash #406338
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Dana Nessel, A. Bryce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv13034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Turner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01055
Plaintiff:
Heather L Turner and Heather L. Turner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Resch #304507 v. Catholic Charities of Jackson, Lenawee, and Hillsdale Counties et al
as 1:2021cv00914
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marcus Resch #304507
Defendant:
Catholic Charities of Jackson, Lenawee, and Hillsdale Counties, Arthur Dudley Campfield, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner #171187 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00790
Plaintiff:
Phillip Turner #171187
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Sherry Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv12166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schopper v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Daemon Schopper
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Rick Thomas, Unknown Jupin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
