Cases 51 - 60 of 571
Claiforina Asphalt Production, Inc. v. UBS AG, London Branch et al
as 2:2021cv03114
Defendant:
DOES 1-50, Inclusive,, UBS AG, a public company organized under the laws of Switzerland, UBS AG, London Branch, a UK Establishment of UBS AG and others
Plaintiff:
Claiforina Asphalt Production, Inc. and California Asphalt Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 20-1987
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W. Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, David Klusendorf, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Bank Dublin PLC, formerly known as Bear Stearns Bank PLC, Portigon/WestLB AG, Credit Suisse International and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BBA Libor, Ltd., Credit Suisse Group AG, Lloyds Bank PLC, FKA Lloyds TSB Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Berkshire Bank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Ritchie Capital Management, et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al
as 18-1130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ritchie Special Credit Investments, Ltd., Ritchie Capital Management, Ltd., Rhone Holdings II, Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBS AG Stamford Branch, J.P. Morgan Europe Ltd., Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Randall L. Seaver, Trustee of Petters Capital, LLC, Douglas A. Kelley, Trustee of the PCI Liquidating Trust and John R. Stoebner, Trustee of Polaroid Corp, et al.
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Private Bank
GRM Resources Pte. Ltd. v. Xcoal Energy & Resources et al
as 1:2021cv02170
Garnishee:
UBS AG, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and others
Plaintiff:
GRM Resources Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Xcoal Energy & Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad
Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC
as 21-56
Defendant / Appellee:
UBS Securities, LLC and UBS AG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trevor Murray
Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC
as 20-4202
Defendant / Appellant:
UBS Securities, LLC and UBS AG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Trevor Murray
Kathleen Johnson, et al v. UBS AG
as 20-56253
Defendant / Appellee:
UBS AG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN K. JOHNSON, Individually and as Trustee of The Annabell M. Palmer Family Trust and JUDITH WOODARD, Individually and as Trustee of The Annabell M. Palmer Family Trust
Vera v. The Republic of Cuba
as 1:2012cv01596
Plaintiff:
Aldo Vera, Jr.
Petitioner:
Alfredo Villoldo, Jeanette Fuller Hausler, Gustavo Villoldo and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba and Banco Financiero Internacional S.A.
Garnishee:
RBS Citizens, N.A., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Commerzbank AG and others
Respondent:
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
BBVA Colombia S.A., AT&T Corp., Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. and others
Not Yet Classified:
MOPEDS Slovakia L.T.D., Unicredit Bank Czech Republic and Slovakia, a.s. and Wiliam Fuller
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Banco do Brasil, S.A., BPD Bank, Banco Internacional De Comercio, S.A. and others
Intervenor:
National Bank of Canada, National Bank Financial Group and Gustavo E. Villoldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03408
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3626
Defendant:
Rabobank Group, Citigroup Global Markets Japan, Inc., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deutsche Bank AG, RBS Securities Japan Limited, R.P. Martin Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Intervenor:
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
