Cases 51 - 60 of 2,222
Richardson et al v. USA
as 4:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann Richardson and Mary Lou Richardson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Forte v. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv06101
Plaintiff:
Margaret Forte
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services, Inc., Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc, Depuy Synthes Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. USA
as 4:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brooks
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jackson v. USA
as 4:2023cv01051
Petitioner:
Antonio Deshun Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. SMS Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Defendant:
SMS Group Inc, SMS Group GmbH, SMS USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Culbertson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Billy N Culbertson
Defendant:
USA and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walls v. USA
as 4:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Darrell Walls
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lacy v. Garrett et al
as 4:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lacy
Defendant:
Garrett, Tutwilder Correctional Facility, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naillieux v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Naillieux
Defendant:
USA, Does Ploicing, Judges, and Office employees and Does Policing, Judges, and Office employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sealed 5 v. USA
as 4:2023cv00948
Petitioner:
Eric Deshon Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
