Cases 51 - 60 of 462
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, John Does 1-20, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00143
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Roger N Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Julia Diane Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Leggett & Platt, Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Rogers Criddle
Plaintiff:
Kathy Pettit Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easley v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Roger Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Rogers v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00330
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Monte Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Rogers
as 3:2020cv00273
Plaintiff:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charlie Q. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Rogers et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Tony Rogers, Kevin Crook, Edward Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Sierra White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
