Cases 51 - 60 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019md02879
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
C.C. et al v. University of Maryland Charles Regional Health, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03891
Defendant:
University of Maryland Community Medical Group, Inc. and University of Maryland Charles Regional Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travis Cooper, Carmen Cooper, Leighara Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liccione v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv01768
Plaintiff:
John Liccione
Defendant:
The State of Maryland , The Howard CountyDistrict Court Commissioner's Office , The Howard County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv01210
Plaintiff:
Travis X. Carr
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423
Curtiss v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv01087
Plaintiff:
Travis Curtiss
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Terry v. Bishop et al
as 8:2018cv00726
Plaintiff:
Travis Terry
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jeff Nines and William Bohrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Ashraf, MD et al
as 1:2017cv03695
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Mahbood Ashraf, MD, Holly L Pierce, CRNP, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boddy v. USA-2255
as 8:2017cv02751
Petitioner:
Damien Travis Boddy
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
