Cases 51 - 60 of 147
Durkel v. Marion County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2019cv00453
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, William Woods, Marion County Board of County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rueben Durkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. KOCHIS, et al
as 2:2019cv17591
Plaintiff:
BONITA BROWN
Defendant:
WILLIAM WOODS and THOMAS KOCHIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mincoff v. Woods
as 3:2019cv01562
Respondent:
Warden William Woods
Petitioner:
James Mincoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02782
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beshears v. Marion County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2019cv00329
Defendant:
William Arias, FNU Kern, Rodney Woodson and others
Plaintiff:
Vantice Lee Beshears, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv03069
Respondent:
Attorney General, Warden D. J. Harmon, Warden Barnhardt and others
Petitioner:
Oscar Paige, Jr., Antonio Lamont Martez Harris and Dymond Charles Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beshears v. Marion County Florida et al
as 5:2019cv00304
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, William Woods, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Vantice Lee Beshears, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ELMWOOD PARK POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2019cv09565
Plaintiff:
GILES BROWN
Defendant:
ELMWOOD PARK POLICE DEPT., DETECTIVE THOMAS KOCHIS and DETECTIVE WILLIAM WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASKEW v. WOODS
as 3:2019cv00434
Petitioner:
JOHN MICHAEL HASKEW
Respondent:
WILLIAM WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Combe Laboratories, Inc., Combe Incorporated, Combe International, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
