Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Midland Odessa, LLC v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00237
Plaintiff: Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Midland Odessa, LLC
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Bridgeport Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5249
Plaintiff / Appellee: Bridgeport Hospital, doing business as Yale New Haven Health, Greenwich Hospital, Yale-New Haven Hospital and others
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1931
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
University of Colorado Health, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee: University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital, formerly known as Memorial Hospital of Colorado Springs, Banner Heart Hospital, Banner Baywood Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Bagnall v. Becerra We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1642
Intervenor: Jessie Ruschmann, Representitive of the Estate of Frederick Ruschmann, Louis Dziadzia, Loretta Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, George Renshaw, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Mary Smith, Representative of the Estate of Martha Leyanna and others
Plaintiff: Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Sarah Mulcahy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellee: Brenda Hardy, Executrix of the Estate of Loretta Jackson and Michael Holt, Executor of the Estate of Charles Holt
Defendant / Appellant: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae: AARP, AARP Foundation, National Disability Rights Network and others
Advocate Christ Medical Center, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5214
Plaintiff / Appellant: Advocate Christ Medical Center, also known as Advocate Christian Hospotal, Advocate Condell Medical Center, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, also known as Advocate Nirthside Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01960
Plaintiff: SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT JAMES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Petitioner: THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, INGALLS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Steffen et al v. Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff: Mark G. Steffen, Lisa Steffen, AARP Medicare Advantage/UHC Claims Admin. Optum and others
Defendant: Texas Roadhouse Management Corp., Holcomb Gorby LLC, ABC Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BCFS Hlth and Human Svcs v. LABR
as 22-50361
Plaintiff / Appellant: BCFS Health and Human Services
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Labor, Marty J. Walsh, Secretary, Jessica Looman, Acting Administrator Wage and Hour Division, in her official capacity and others
Angelitos Health Care v. Becerra
as 22-40298
Plaintiff / Appellant: Angelitos Health Care, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and Jennifer Lowery

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?