Cases 51 - 60 of 24,480
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
Aikaterini Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Olson, Morgan v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Morgan M. Olson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GEORGE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
CEANN RAE GEORGE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Buggle v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03300
Plaintiff:
Michelle Anderson Buggle
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wharton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ann Wharton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lewis Miller, Jr. and Lewis Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peacock v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Peacock
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoffman, Tracy v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Hoffman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Watson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
