Cases 61 - 70 of 236
Olsen v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Division of Finance, The, Utah Department of Administrative Services and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Norman Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David et al v. Midway City et al
as 2:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Midway City, Eric K. Mecham and Wasatch County
Plaintiff:
Lad Company, The and Lynn A. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hafen v. Enloe et al
as 2:2019cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Jayhawk Enterprises, Jackson E. Enloe, Eric R. Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Davis et al v. Parkinson et al
as 2:2019mc00701
Defendant:
Hinds & Shankman, Medallion Releasing, Eric Parkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Uptone Pictures and Michael Davis
Bourgeois v. Resource Management et al
as 2:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Eric Lagerquist, Horizon Realty Advisors and Resource Management
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bourgeois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larson v. DeMando et al
as 2:2019cv00572
Plaintiff:
Arthur Eric Larson
Defendant:
Luxottica Optical Manufacturing and Thomas I. DeMando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00511
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Nelson v. SymbolArts
as 2:2019cv00340
Plaintiff:
Eric Nelson
Defendant:
SymbolArts
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Davis v. Utah, State of
as 2:2018cv00893
Petitioner:
Eric Joseph Davis
Respondent:
Utah, State of
Undetermined:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
