Cases 61 - 70 of 264
James v. Horn et al
as 1:2019cv01369
Defendant:
C Brown, . Harmon, Patrick Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Ned James, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cockrell v. Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04658
Plaintiff:
Melinda Cockrell
Defendant:
Dayna Sokol and Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
Frischhertz v. King et al
as 1:2019cv01017
Defendant:
Michael Looney Trucking, LLC, World Class Express, Inc., Phillip King and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Frischhertz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FILING ERROR
as 5:2019cv01235
Defendant:
Michael Looney Trucking, LLC, World Class Express, Inc., Phillip King and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Frischhertz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brett v. Sneed et al
as 3:2019cv03213
Defendant:
John Sokol, Tilden, Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORKER v. ALLMAN et al
as 4:2019cv00363
Defendant:
FRANCIS ALLMAN, LAWANDA WARREN, JUANITA LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CORKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Sunde, et al v. Nevada Divorce & Document ServIn re: Joseph Sunde, et al v. Nevada Divorce & Document Serv
as 19-16417
Appellant:
VIKTORIYA SOKOL SUNDE and JOSEPH MICHAEL SUNDE, AKA J. Michael Sunde
Appellee:
NEVADA DIVORCE & DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC.
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JOSEPH MICHAEL SUNDE, AKA J. Michael Sunde
Haywood v. Renzi et al
as 1:2019cv01242
Defendant:
Todd Nelson, H Cox, Travis Bayler and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Sunde, et al v. USDC-NVR
as 19-71707
Petitioner:
VIKTORIYA SOKOL SUNDE and J. MICHAEL SUNDE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: J. MICHAEL SUNDE
Not Yet Classified:
NEVADA DIVORCE & DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC.
Morris v. Simmons et al
as 1:2019cv00832
Defendant:
Calvina Turner, Susan Sokol and Edward G Simmons
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Morris, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
