Cases 61 - 70 of 298
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Selman et al
as 4:2019cv01737
Respondent:
C. Lee, S. Logan, k. Gunter and others
Petitioner:
Vernon King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
as 3:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Pamela H Patsley, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Khon Meng Chew
In Re:
MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
Anderson et al v Shelby Operating Company et al
as 2:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Colter Harris, Shelby Resource Management, Pamela Tyiska and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Anderson and Ethel Pogue
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kaplan v. Holmes et al
as 3:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Ganesh B Rao, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
Aubrey et al v. D Magazine Partners LP et al
as 3:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Scott Robert Sayers, Does 1-20, City of Dallas and others
Plaintiff:
Steven B Aubrey and Brian E Vodicka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Vaughn et al
as 9:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Oliver K Horton
Defendant:
Unidentified Vaughn and Eastham Units Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollie et al v. Vaughn et al
as 4:2019cv00524
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Vincent Henry, Austin O'Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Hollie, Latoya Smith and Carol Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Davis
as 2:2019cv00031
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Lee Vaughn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glassman et al v. Roe-Anderson et al
as 4:2018cv03521
Plaintiff:
Craig Whiting, Elizabeth Glassman, Jesse Glassman and others
Defendant:
Kim Rogers-Porter, Heather Vaughn, Aaron Fincham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
