Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Carey v. Britton (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00596
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Carey
Defendant:
Darren Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02402
Plaintiff:
Donna Carey , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer et al v. Public Storage, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00357
Plaintiff:
Carey Spencer , Susan Spencer and Joshua Spencer
Defendant:
Public Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carey v. Danford et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00772
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Carey
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blackwell v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Emma Carey Blackwell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winfield v. Breckic et al
as 2:2010cv01497
Plaintiff:
Carey Edward Winfield
Defendant:
Breckic, Donaldson Corr Facility and Alabama Department of Corr
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Tolbert et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Carey Tolbert, Corey Welch, Jay Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelms v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2009cv00816
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Nelms
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Carey Torbert and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rockett v. Carey et al
as 2:2009cv00985
Plaintiff:
Carl Rockett
Defendant:
Allen Carey and Cox Radio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Winfield v. Foster et al
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Carey Edward Winfield
Defendant:
Foster and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
