Cases 61 - 70 of 675
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CLARK v. SNOWDEN
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE CLARK
Defendant:
ERIC SNOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. CARTER JR et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
PONIE CLARK
Defendant:
ROBERT ERIC CARTER JR, FRANK VANIHEL, MIKE HERRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
DAVIS v. ASHBA et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
SONNY DAVIS
Defendant:
ASHBA, STEVENS, JOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Fulton County et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sharica R Clark and Sharica Renee Clark
Defendant:
Fulton County, Mike Marrs, Napannee City Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISTRUNK v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
GARY KEITH SISTRUNK
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY JAIL, ARAMARK USA, CAPTAIN GURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanefeld v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Zachary R Hanefeld
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Quality Correctional Care, Dr Galpirin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Sy-Bron L Pinkston
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of, Susan Hughes, Christopher Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
