Cases 61 - 70 of 78
LEWIS et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2010at00509
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, FRANKI SANDOVAL, ADRIAN MONTANO and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD M. LEWIS, DONALD D. LEWIS, BOB MALDONADO and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lewis et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2010cv01281
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, Clarence Jones, Lester Burrough and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford M. Lewis , Donald D. Lewis , Bob Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jones v. Makul et al
as 3:2010cv01311
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jones
Defendant:
Anthony Makul, F/V Spirit Makul and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Jones v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv00521
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jones
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aaron Jones et al v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Thomas Downey, Sr., Aaron Jones, Isabella Jones and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Parsons et al v. Koppers Inc. f/k/a Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Maria Parsons , Michael Parsons , Mary Ann Jones and others
Defendant:
Koppers Inc. f/k/a Koppers Industries, Inc., Cabot Corporation and BEAZER EAST, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Jones et al v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00687
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jones, Aaron Jones, Aaron Jones and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
