Cases 61 - 70 of 812
Oates El v. United States Treasury Department, The et al
as 0:2022cv02907
Plaintiff:
Lovell Nahmour Oates El
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department, The, State of Minnesota, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stark et al v. Show Me Painting LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02741
Plaintiff:
Jeff Stark, Clark Anderson, Bill Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Show Me Painting LLC and Terronya Fulford Block
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv02358
Plaintiff:
Paula Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Jetoh
as 0:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
Antaeus Anderson
Defendant:
Sherice Jetoh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Stark et al v. Advanced Architectural Glazing L.L.C.
as 0:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
Jeff Stark, Clark Anderson, Bill Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Advanced Architectural Glazing L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Anderson v. Vandais
as 0:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
Antaeus D. Anderson
Defendant:
Kimberly Vandais
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salcedo et al v. Uecker et al
as 0:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Brenda Salcedo, Dennis M Novack, Janet C Novack and others
Defendant:
Todd Uecker, Wayne D Anderson, Nathan Bissonette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982 Property Rights of Citizens
Partridge v. State of Minnesota Beltrami County et al
as 0:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Bruce Justin Partridge
Defendant:
State of Minnesota Beltrami County, Beltrami County, City of Bemidji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
