Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Tevarius Green v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1421
Petitioner:
Tevarius Tevon Green
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Wilson v. Saez et al
as 5:2021cv05219
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Wilson
Defendant:
Dr. Roberto Saez, Turn Key Healthcare Clinics, LLC, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Fletcher v. Dexter Payne
as 21-3701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Fletcher
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as State of Arkansas)
Nichols v. Kerstein et al
as 2:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Gary R Kerstein, Tracy Bennett, Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durflinger v. Hutchison et al
as 4:2021cv01089
Plaintiff:
Damian Durflinger
Defendant:
Asa Hutchison, Tom Cotton, Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmitt Riley v. Dexter Payne
as 21-3508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Emmitt Riley
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Darrell Dennis v. Dexter Payne
as 21-3284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Dennis
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Dexter Paine)
Kenneth Pitts v. Greg Shilling, et al
as 21-2980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Shilling, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Division of Correction, Robertson, Field Hoe Squad Major, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Division of Correction, Ray Naylon, Inmate Grievance Appeals Administrator and others
John Lukach v. Dexter Payne
as 21-2691
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Richard Lukach, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director of the Arkansas Division of Correction
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
