Cases 61 - 70 of 503
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul Johnson v. Ronald Broomfield, et al
as 23-15376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden and L. TOBIN
EL et al v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
NOBLE CHRISTO EL, TRE N VISCO, LEONARD LUDWIGSEN, JR and others
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY (in his individual and official capacity) doing business as DAVID KELSEY, WARDEN, K. BROWN, "JOHN" CHARLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mwasi v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, CA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreland v. 1st Franklin Financial Corporation
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Moreland, Mark Dunn, Joshua Allen and others
Defendant:
1st Franklin Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Broomfield v. Baily
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Kwentel Broomfield
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Bailey, Corrections Officer Dotson, Corrections Officer Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Brown
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. John Broomfield, Jr.
as 23-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Earl Broomfield, Jr.
Jerome Carpenter v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-15182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME CARPENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden and D. NELSON, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
