Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv05827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Garrett v. Dedeaux, et al
as 2:2011cv02743
Plaintiff:
Lori C Garrett
Defendant:
Lancer Insurance Company , Southern Trucking Express, Inc. , Kenneth J Dedeaux and others
Cross_claimant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Kenneth J Dedeaux , Lancer Insurance Company and Southern Trucking Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Garrett
as 8:2011cv01175
Plaintiff:
George A. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
C. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65066
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS GARRETT and CATHERINE C GARRETT
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Celestine v. England et al
as 6:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
Vicky Elaine Celestine
Defendant:
Audrey A. England, C. Garrett and B. Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Van Olst et al
as 2:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
James C Garrett
Defendant:
Kathy Van Olst, Dow Constantine and Larry Gossett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharon Y Sosa et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Ankur Baishya, Irina Barbarov, Natalie Daliah Barrantes and others
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GARRETT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30266
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. GARRETT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
