Cases 61 - 70 of 391
CARDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CARDOZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lexington Insurance Company et al v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv05929
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company, Homeland Insurance Company of New York, Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Anita Neal, Eric Nielsen, Jerry Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CREAGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04196
Plaintiff:
GORDON CREAGER, MELISSA BAGWELL, RODERICK BARRIS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02592
Plaintiff:
Gordon Creager, Melissa Bagwell, Roderick Barris and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Keith Sekerke v. City of National City, et al
as 21-56062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, KEVIN HIRSH, MATT SMITH and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cardoza v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv01332
Plaintiff:
W. Kenmore Cardoza
Defendant:
David R. Mitchell, Luis Ignacio Solorzano Aizpuru, Kimberly H. Sheehy and others
Nominal Defendant:
Carlotz, Inc.
Cardoza Alfaro v. Garland
as 21-766
Petitioner:
ROBERTO A CARDOZA ALFARO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Martinez-Cardoza
as 21-50856
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nehemias Martinez-Cardoza
CARDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51295
Plaintiff:
JEROND CARDOZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
