Cases 61 - 70 of 394
SANBORN v. COLVIN
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD FRANCIS SANBORN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CREWS v. AMERICAN CREDIT ACCEPTANCE et al
as 2:2016cv06582
Plaintiff:
KANGI E. CREWS
Defendant:
AMERICAN CREDIT ACCEPTANCE, PAR NORTH AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THATCHER et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05963
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD THATCHER and KATHLEEN THATCHER
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv05717
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUSEMAN v. MOLINARO et al
as 2:2016cv01176
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD HUSEMAN
Defendant:
CARMINE MOLINARO, ROBERT CREGUT, JOSEPH FICHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNEGAN v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv03647
Plaintiff:
ERIK FINNEGAN
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TERRANCE P. MOORE, CLIFFORD MITHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC. v. CONTE
as 2:2016cv03270
Plaintiff:
CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
CLIFFORD CONTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAVARRETE v. OWENS et al
as 2:2016cv01474
Plaintiff:
ADAN NAVARRETE
Defendant:
CLIFFORD OWENS and SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
TROY v. THE CHARTWELL LAW OFFICES, LLP et al
as 2:2016cv00961
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. TROY
Defendant:
THE CHARTWELL LAW OFFICES, LLP , CLIFFORD GOLDSTEIN and THOMAS STROHMETZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
