Cases 61 - 70 of 303
Weaver v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 7:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wonson v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Orlando O Wonson
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Cook v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
ERWIN COOK
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cook v. Sasser
as 5:2021hc02057
Petitioner:
Johnny Mack Cook
Respondent:
Judge Douglas Sasser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Olavarria v. Wake County Board of Education et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Olavarria
Defendant:
Jacquline Cunningham, Emily Mae Bishop, Marsie Rabii and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Odom v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated and William Cook Europe APS
Plaintiff:
Glender Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2020cv00629
Defendant:
Wake County Family Courts System, John Smith, Robert Rader and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Cook Medical Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00534
Defendant:
William Cook Europe, APS, Cook Medical LLC and Cook Medical Incorporated
Plaintiff:
JAMES B SMITH and James B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Rewards Network
as 5:2020cv00532
Defendant:
Rewards Network
Plaintiff:
Darryl Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
