Cases 61 - 70 of 105
TSX Toys, Inc. v. 665, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv02400
Defendant:
665 Inc, CA-WA Corp, Daniel L Cossette and others
Plaintiff:
TSX Toys Inc
Collymore v. LaJoie et al
as 3:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Collymore
Defendant:
Michael LaJoie, Jon Brightaupt, James Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Hogan et al
as 3:2014cv01166
Plaintiff:
Michael Castillo
Defendant:
Hogan, Johnson, Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Putnam v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv02122
Defendant:
Grievance Coordinator Blythe, Steve Brown, Officer Cossette and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Alan Putnam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Evan Cossette
as 13-3691
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Evan Cossette
Siddhar v. Edelheit et al
as 1:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar, Annamalai Annamalai and Dr. Commander Selvam
Defendant:
Aaron Edelheit, American Home Real Estate Company Florida LLC, American Home Real Estate Partnership LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Huston v. Cossette et al
as 3:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Donald Huston
Defendant:
Jeffry Cossette , Timothy Topulos , Mark Walerysiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Cossette et al
as 3:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Brian Sullivan
Defendant:
Jeffry Cossette , Timothy Topulos , Mark Walerysiak and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Donald Huston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Meriden Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Meriden Police Department, K Egan, John Slezak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Doe et al
as 3:2013cv00432
Defendant:
John Doe, K egan, John Slezak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
